The construction schedule of values is the foundational document of the construction draw process, the line-item breakdown of the total construction contract amount into individual cost categories that defines both how draws are requested and how the monitoring firm assesses completion at each inspection. A well-structured schedule of values makes the draw process transparent and auditable. A poorly structured or manipulated schedule of values is one of the most effective tools available to a GC who wants to receive payment faster than the work is actually progressing.
Understanding the schedule of values, what it should contain, what a front-loaded schedule looks like, and how lenders should review it, is foundational knowledge for construction lenders and their monitoring firms.
What the Schedule of Values Contains
A construction schedule of values breaks the total construction contract into individual line items that correspond to the major cost categories of the work. A multifamily residential project’s schedule of values might include line items for: general conditions, site work, concrete, masonry, structural steel, rough carpentry, waterproofing, roofing, exterior windows and doors, rough MEP, insulation, drywall, interior doors and hardware, millwork and casework, flooring, painting, finish MEP, elevators, fire protection, and landscape.
Each line item has a scheduled value, the portion of the total contract amount allocated to that scope of work. As construction progresses, the GC submits payment applications that claim a percentage of completion for each line item. The draw amount for each line item is the scheduled value multiplied by the claimed completion percentage, less any retainage withheld.
The sum of the claimed completion amounts across all line items produces the total draw request for that payment period.
Front-Loading: How It Works and Why It Matters
Front-loading is the practice of allocating more value to line items that will be completed early in the project and less value to line items that will be completed later, in a way that is not consistent with the actual cost distribution. A GC who front-loads the schedule of values will receive more payment early in the project, before the work is done, and will effectively receive an interest-free loan from the owner for the difference between what they were paid and what the work actually cost.
A simple example: a GC whose total contract is $5 million front-loads the schedule of values by allocating $300,000 to site work (which costs $200,000) and $200,000 to finish carpentry (which costs $300,000). When site work is complete, the GC claims 100% completion of the $300,000 line item and receives $300,000, $100,000 more than the work actually cost. When finish carpentry is complete, the GC claims 100% of the $200,000 line item and receives $200,000, $100,000 less than that work actually cost. The GC’s total payment over the project is the same, but the timing is shifted to the GC’s benefit and the owner’s detriment.
For construction lenders, front-loading creates a specific risk: at any point during construction, the outstanding loan balance is higher than it would be if the schedule of values reflected actual cost distribution. If the project stops for any reason, GC default, funding shortfall, borrower financial distress, the lender’s collateral (the partially complete building) is worth less than the loan balance. The funding gap between the amount disbursed and the cost of completing the project is larger than a properly structured schedule of values would have produced.
What Front-Loading Looks Like in Practice
The most common front-loading patterns in construction schedules of values:
Inflated general conditions. General conditions, the project overhead costs like project supervision, temporary facilities, and equipment, are front-loaded by claiming a high percentage of completion early in the project. Because general conditions are consumed throughout the project rather than installed at a specific point, they are difficult to verify by field inspection. An inspector cannot easily confirm that 40% of the general conditions have been consumed; they can only observe that the site is active and the project is progressing.
Elevated mobilization line items. Some schedules of values include a separate mobilization line item for the cost of setting up the project, temporary power, site fencing, trailer installation. Inflating this line item allows the GC to receive a large payment at the project’s outset before significant work is performed.
Material procurement claims. Claiming that materials have been procured and are stored off-site, before they have actually been ordered or delivered, is another front-loading mechanism. Legitimate stored materials claims should include documentation that the materials exist, are insured, and are segregated for the specific project.
How Lenders Should Review the Schedule of Values
The schedule of values should be reviewed independently, before the construction loan closes, by the monitoring firm as part of the pre-closing plan and cost review. The review should assess whether the line item allocations are consistent with the known cost distribution for the project type, whether any line items appear inflated relative to their expected cost, and whether the schedule of values structure will support meaningful inspection-based completion assessment at each draw.
A monitoring firm reviewing the schedule of values should also confirm that the line items are granular enough to support meaningful completion assessment. A schedule of values with five line items for a $5 million project does not provide the granularity needed to accurately assess completion or cost-to-complete at each inspection. A schedule with fifty line items provides meaningful visibility into each major scope of work.
Lenders who do not review the schedule of values as part of their pre-closing process are accepting the structure that the GC has proposed without independent assessment of whether that structure serves the lender’s interests.
For a complete treatment of this topic, see our guide to construction management: the complete guide for developers and owners. Innergy Integral provides these services in Seattle, WA and across our six-state footprint.
Related: Construction Loan Monitoring · Draw Inspection Services · Plan and Cost Review · Construction Loan Monitoring Guide
Markets: Construction Loan Monitoring Seattle WA · Construction Loan Monitoring Dallas TX · Construction Loan Monitoring El Paso TX