Credit unions that have expanded into commercial construction lending over the past decade have done so for sound business reasons: construction loans often carry higher yields than the consumer and residential products that form the core of most credit union loan portfolios, and member-businesses that need construction financing represent opportunities to deepen relationships that might otherwise go to commercial banks. The expansion has been largely successful, but it has brought credit unions into a lending category with specific risk characteristics that differ from residential and consumer lending in ways that some credit unions have learned the hard way.
The Regulatory Framework for Credit Union Construction Lending
Credit union construction lending is governed by NCUA regulations and guidance that parallel, but are not identical to, the OCC and FDIC guidance that applies to bank construction lending. NCUA’s guidance on member business loans, under which most commercial construction loans are classified, establishes specific underwriting, approval, and monitoring requirements that credit unions must meet.
NCUA Rule 723 governs member business loans and establishes concentration limits (member business loans generally cannot exceed 12.25% of total assets for federally chartered credit unions, with some exceptions), underwriting requirements, and approval authorities. NCUA’s examinations of credit unions with significant construction lending portfolios assess whether the credit union’s monitoring programs meet the guidance’s standards for independence, frequency, and documentation.
Credit unions that are growing their construction portfolios should be aware that NCUA examiner attention to construction lending quality has increased since the 2008–2010 cycle, during which a number of credit unions experienced significant construction loan losses. Examiners now look specifically for evidence that the credit union has an independent monitoring program, not just loan officer oversight of borrowers with whom they have established relationships.
The Member Relationship Dynamic
The credit union’s cooperative structure and member relationship model create a dynamic that is different from commercial bank construction lending. Credit union borrowers are members, they have a different relationship with the institution than a bank customer, and that relationship sometimes creates pressure on credit union staff to approve draws or accommodate borrower requests in ways that compromise monitoring integrity.
A member-developer who has been borrowing from the credit union for 15 years, whose business relationships bring other members to the institution, and whose personal deposits represent significant balances is a borrower with real relationship leverage. When that member submits a draw request that the monitoring program’s inspection doesn’t fully support, the relationship pressure to fund the draw anyway is real and human. Protecting against this pressure requires that the monitoring program include clear policies specifying that inspection findings must be resolved before draws are funded, policies that apply consistently regardless of the member’s history or relationship depth.
Concentration Risk in Credit Union Portfolios
Credit unions typically serve specific geographic communities or employer groups. This community focus is the credit union’s mission, it is also a source of concentration risk in construction lending that commercial banks with broader geographic reach don’t face in the same way.
A credit union that serves a specific metropolitan area, and whose construction lending portfolio is concentrated in that area’s development market, has a portfolio whose performance is tightly correlated with that market’s economic conditions. A local market downturn, driven by a major employer departure, a sudden interest rate increase affecting multifamily absorption, or a construction cost spike that impairs project economics, will affect the credit union’s entire construction portfolio simultaneously.
For credit unions managing construction loan concentration, the monitoring program’s cost-to-complete analysis at each draw is particularly important: it provides the data needed to identify early whether projects across the portfolio are experiencing budget stress, before that stress becomes individual loan defaults.
What Credit Union Construction Monitoring Should Include
Independent third-party inspection is as important for credit union construction loans as for bank construction loans, arguably more important, given the relationship dynamics that can compromise internal monitoring rigor. The monitoring program for a credit union’s construction portfolio should include the same elements as any well-structured bank program: pre-closing plan and cost review by a qualified independent party, field inspection at each draw, written inspection reports reviewed before draw approval, lien waiver collection as a draw condition, and cost-to-complete analysis that is updated at each inspection.
The pre-closing plan and cost review is particularly valuable for credit unions that are expanding into construction product types or markets where they have limited experience. A credit union that has historically done single-family construction loans for member-builders and is now considering multifamily or commercial construction is moving into a product type whose complexity is substantially greater. Pre-closing review by a professional who knows that product type provides the independent cost and schedule assessment that the credit union’s staff may not be positioned to provide from internal expertise.
NCUA examiners reviewing a credit union’s construction lending program will specifically look for evidence that monitoring is independent, that the people conducting oversight are not the same people who have primary borrower relationships, and that monitoring findings are documented and acted upon consistently.
Credit unions that approach construction lending with appropriately structured monitoring programs, clear underwriting standards for borrower experience and project complexity, and realistic portfolio concentration limits consistently build construction lending programs that outperform both expectations and peer performance benchmarks.
Credit unions that approach construction lending with the same discipline they bring to their broader lending programs, with clear underwriting standards, appropriate monitoring requirements, and realistic concentration limits, consistently build construction lending programs that serve their members well, satisfy their examiners, and generate the returns that justify the complexity of the product. Construction lending is not inherently more risky than other credit union lending products, it is more risky when it is managed without the discipline that the product’s construction-phase dynamics require.
Innergy Integral provides these services in Seattle, WA and across our six-state footprint.
Related: Construction Loan Monitoring · Community Bank Construction Lending · Lender Advisory Services · Construction Loan Monitoring Guide
Markets: Construction Loan Monitoring Washington State · Construction Loan Monitoring Texas · Construction Loan Monitoring Pacific Northwest